QubicQubıc
Process · Industrial manufacturing

A company that grew — and no longer knew who was actually contributing what.

90 employees · eastern Croatia · 6 months

After growing to 90 employees, the owner no longer knew who was contributing how much. We set up a measurement system that, within 6 months, made the first results-tied bonuses possible.

−73%

4h 30min1h 12min

Time per order

Context

An industrial manufacturer from eastern Croatia with 90 employees — producing specialized components for the European market. Growth over the past 5 years from 30 to 90 people happened organically, through new contracts and added shifts. Processes grew reactively, without systematic planning.

The owner noticed concrete signals: he no longer knew who was actually contributing how much, some staff worked twice as much as others, and no bonus system existed — which meant annual bonuses were becoming a "political" decision, which led to dissatisfaction among the best people.

On top of that: all production paperwork (work orders, quality control, maintenance logs) was still going through Excel and paper documents. Shift leads were spending 2–3 hours a day on filling in reports by hand.

What didn't work first

We tried the standard playbook first — writing SOPs, department training sessions, monthly reports. Two months later the processes looked the same. People knew what to do, but didn't change habits because the wider system wasn't changing accountability.

Approach

We started with Business Process Improvement — the diagnostic phase identified where the real time losses were and where no measurable performance criteria existed.

We structured the solution in three layers.

Measurement layer — we defined concrete performance criteria by role. Shift leads have measurable targets around output and quality. Maintenance technicians have targets around proactive interventions. Admin has clear SLAs for order processing. Every criterion is tracked weekly, not monthly — a shorter measurement interval means faster correction.

Bonus and progression — we tied the measurement criteria to concrete financial consequences. Bonuses are now transparent — everyone knows what's measured and how it translates into a reward. The progression plan clearly shows which skills and results need to be demonstrated for promotion.

Paper digitization — work orders, quality control, and maintenance logs were moved from Excel into a system that connects all data. Shift leads no longer write reports by hand — the system generates them automatically from data that's entered during the work anyway. For routine document classification we also wired in AI & Automation.

Delivered

  • Performance measurement system by role with a weekly tracking rhythm.
  • Transparent bonus system tied to measurable criteria.
  • Progression plan with clear criteria by level.
  • Digitization of work orders, quality control, and maintenance logs.
  • Training for shift leads and admin on the new system.

Result

  • Time spent on admin dropped by 45% — shift leads now spend 30–45 minutes a day on reports instead of 2–3 hours.
  • First results-tied bonus system in the company's 8 years. The owner is now in a position to reward concrete contribution, not impressions.
  • The best people recognized financially, which reduced the attrition they'd been seeing earlier.
  • Production quality improved without any investment in equipment — purely because technicians now had clear criteria and a system to track them. What gets measured, people naturally improve.

At a glance

  • Measurable

    Contribution for every role

  • −45%

    Time spent on admin

  • 1st

    Bonus system in 8 years

You don't change a process with a document — you change it when someone stops working the old way because they have a reason to.
— Head of operations

INTERFACE EXAMPLE

Operational excellence means fewer steps, clear ownership, measurable results. See the example.

Interface illustration · Anonymized

What we learned

A measurement system isn't bureaucracy — it's a language that lets people be recognized. Without a measurable criterion, the best people naturally pull back, because they don't trust that their contribution will be seen.

Client identity anonymized per contractual discretion. Numbers and context are accurate.